# J.G.G. v. Trump **Status: stub — expand.** Vote counts to be verified against Oyez before they are stated here. The Supreme Court vacated the district court's restraining orders against removals under the [[Alien Enemies Act]] on **venue** grounds, holding that detainees must challenge their removal by **habeas corpus in the district of confinement** — while also holding that they are entitled to notice "within a reasonable time" sufficient to actually seek relief. Both halves mattered. The venue holding scattered a consolidated class action into individual petitions filed one district at a time; the notice holding is what the government then failed. In **A.A.R.P. v. Trump** (May 16, 2025) the Court held that roughly 24 hours' notice was not reasonable. **Why it matters:** the government won the forum and lost the case. The Alien Enemies Act invocation failed on **notice**, not on the meaning of "invasion" — the statute's substantive scope remains undecided after *W.M.M. v. Trump* was dismissed as moot by the Fifth Circuit en banc on August 13, 2026, every named plaintiff having been removed under ordinary immigration authority instead. See [[Immigration Removal Pipeline]]. ## See Also - [[Habeas Corpus Timeline]] · [[Habeas Corpus]] · [[Suspension Clause]]